Jup Studio @jup_studio 對於meme態度的反覆無常令我對Jupitor Studio希望建立的社區文化感到擔憂—— Jupitor 似乎在鼓勵多變和背叛,而不是團結一致的vibe。 我注意到 Jup Studio 關注/取關 Vibe Cat @vibecatx 官推兩次。而現在它開始關注 $Priceless 的版主。 Jup 公開錢包——持有者可能是 @9yointern —— 在數天前清倉其他代幣,全部買入 $VIBE 。這一操作吸引許多巨鯨和聰明錢買入,而現在他們都虧了一半。 而 @vibecatx 時隔三日的推文,則暗示已經收集到的手續費的用法。至今沒有任何後續。 如果你希望 Jupitor Studio 成為流水盤的溫牀,以至於大家不信任,請繼續這麼做。 如果你希望 Juptor Studio 有正向循環的vibe,請停止你們反覆無常的態度和動作,這對嘗試相信你們的社區成員不負責。 Jup Studio @jup_studio's inconsistent attitude toward memes makes me concerned about the kind of community culture Jupitor Studio is trying to build. It seems like Jupitor is encouraging volatility and betrayal, rather than a united and cohesive vibe. I noticed that Jup Studio followed and unfollowed Vibe Cat @vibecatx’s official Twitter twice. And now it's starting to follow the moderator of $Priceless. Jup’s public wallet, possibly owned by @9yointern, sold off all other tokens a few days ago and went all in on $VIBE. This move attracted many whales and smart money to buy in, and now they've all lost half of their investment. Meanwhile, a tweet from @vibecatx three days ago hinted at how the collected fees would be used. But there has been no follow-up since. If you want Jupitor Studio to become a breeding ground for pump-and-dump schemes and distrust, then by all means, keep doing what you're doing. But if you want Jupitor Studio to have a positive, self-sustaining vibe, then stop this erratic behavior. It's irresponsible to the community members who are trying to trust you. cc: @weremeow @9yointern @jup_studio
查看原文
1.87萬
38
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。