ETH by Sui Bridge price

Flaunchy leveled up! ⬆️ Launch a coin by replying to any post with “@/flaunchybot flaunch it!” Want to split revenue? Just tag users with their % - all revenue is claimable in ETH 🔥

squidfra #3 - accountfi ---------- besides dramatically improving the state of the art in threshold cryptography, @ikadotxyz introduced the novel dwallet primitive, which is the first zero-trust programmable and transferable decentralized signing mechanism. being able to transfer any account on any blockchain is something that was never possible before, and it creates a new type of financial category in crypto - accountfi - which will be possible exclusively on @SuiNetwork if you want a refresher on how account transfer technically works with ika, check out this post: ---------- 1. problem it solves accountfi is a new category, so it will take time to explore the new possibilities it opens up, however there are 4 main problems that can be identified now where account transferability is extremely useful. the first is price discovery where a market can't be created: illiquid assets, intrinsic account value and large/complex portfolios. today there's no way to have a marketplace where locked tokens, soulbound tokens (sbts), vetokens etc. are freely traded. same goes for wallets farming airdrops or gaming accounts with their in-game assets and history or entire multi-chain portfolios. being able to trade an account allows the market to efficiently price basically everything. even things like entire daos or rollups. the second is liquidity. while price discovery is important, being able to make everything liquid in a simplified and secure way is also a big problem. the previous examples are pretty clear, but we can also look at something like gaming as an example. there's a grey market today estimated at over a billion $ annually of buying and selling gaming accounts (including "boosting"). this area is rife with fraud as users share their login credentials and pay with gift cards, but when people go to those lengths and take that level of risk to solve a problem, it just highlights what a big problem that is. side note: as the introduction of accountfi solves problems around efficient market pricing and liquidity of assets, it also creates problems for a lot of existing designs because it breaks their premise. sbts were designed to be non-transferable, the sui kiosk was designed to enforce royalties, locked tokens and vetokens were designed to be illiquid, airdrop designs try to reduce speculating farming activities - accountfi creates the need for more advanced designs, that consider the fact the account itself might be tradable, and this need actually creates more opportunities for accountfi squidfra. the third problem is the gas efficiency and finality of legacy networks (like bitcoin for example). accountfi squidfra allows devs to adopt novel designs where they transfer the account ownership (which has sui+ika low cost and sub-second finality) instead of performing expensive actions on legacy networks and have a long wait for finality, which can be catastrophic in some use cases (think instant native bitcoin collateral liquidations instead of waiting 60 minutes). special shoutout here for the 7 day finality problem of optimistic rollups - accountfi squidfra can casually solve one of ethereum's biggest problems. the fourth is provenance - which might possibly be the biggest problem of all. it's practically impossible to keep track of asset ownership in the blockchain, especially across multiple networks and in networks without smart contracts like bitcoin. accountfi allows for provenance of assets ownership through tracking and enforcing policies on the account owners. that is huge for institutional adoption, since aml regulation and sanctions aren't going anywhere - provenance and proving source of funds are critical problems that don't have a good solution in crypto, and that accountfi can very elegantly solve. ---------- 2. use cases it enables accountfi squidfra can power new designs for existing use cases like trading (transfer accounts instead of tokens) or lending (use an account as collateral), but it also enables many novel use cases. the most obvious novel use case is an account marketplace. being able to buy or sell any account including all of its assets, history and activity. it stands to reason that people will model their activity with this marketplace in mind, creating separate dwallets for different actions and purposes, so that they can be easily priced and sold. another novel use case that i believe can be huge is proof-of-ownership. tracking owners, and potentially limiting ownership to parties that have been vetted in some way (like @HumnPassport proof of clean hands or perhaps full-on kyc/kyb) - will make it very easy to have deeper institutional adoption of crypto. today for example institutions pay bitcoin miners a premium for "virgin bitcoin", which is freshly mined utxos that didn't have any other owners. proof-of-ownership can keep bitcoin "virgin" forever, while enforcing a policy and verifying the full chain of custody adhered to that policy. ---------- 3. existing alternatives today, the only way to transfer an account, is by using some account abstraction setup. that is limited to networks that have this kind of setup and of course only applies to a specific account on that network. @NEARProtocol is a good example of a network that allows that out of the box for near accounts, you can trade account abstraction near accounts and there's even a near account marketplace - @NameSkyApp. theoretically, a legacy mpc network could create an account, give user a the permission to use it, and then move the permission to user b - but as you can already understand, this is a far cry from transferring ownership. in fact, neither user a nor user b ever had ownership, all they had was the permission to do things for an account that is owned by the mpc network. in any case most legacy mpc networks don't go that route anyway because of speed and scalability issues, and instead just operate a single account for many users, managing an internal ledger, and only allowing them to do predefined actions that are supported by their internal ledger. ---------- 4. competitive advantage with ika the whole concept of accountfi is revolutionized and enabled by ika - the novel design of the 2pc-mpc protocol that enables programmable and transferable dwallets makes it possible. this means that sui will be the only place where universal and generic accountfi is possible. besides zero-trust security, the superior speed and scalability of sui and ika also give an edge to accountfi squidfra being used in interoperable defi use cases - sub-second finality for native bitcoin transactions for example is a game changer. ---------- although transferring an account is a built-in ika capability, being able to use it for different use cases is not as straightforward. there are complexities around things like the user share management or connecting between the account and any underlying assets and activity it may have across multiple chains. solving these complexities for devs is low hanging fruit for anyone wanting to build squidfra. i'm super excited about dwallet transferability. i think it's one of the things that will open up an entirely new design space and will reshape crypto, and having robust accountfi squidfra is going to be critical for that. ---------- in the next post, we'll talk about ai-focused squidfra - making decentralized access control work in a digital world that is moving towards ai agent domination