Huma Finance MEME price

WEEK 4 - 06/23/2025 TOTAL FOR WEEK 4 : 1018 USDC EARNED ▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮ 189.45% ✅ MONTH 1 = DONE ☑️ MONTHLY TOTAL: 7577 USDC MONTHLY GOAL: EXCEEDED (>100%) Still have some Huma tokens and around 80k $HOME tokens for later, hoping they go up. ---------------------- Thoughts: Slow week, and coinciding with a bad market = not much money to be had. As always, the two websites are holding me afloat. Can only hope this continues. --------------------- Going forward: The biggest win was the yapper rewards in WEEK 2, which is why I'll be focusing more on boards such as @TheoriqAI, of projects that I am bullish on and can already see my rating improving on the boards for. I have about 4500 yaps, which right now is not a lot and not worth too much, but Kaito is making it so that you can vote with these yaps very soon. You'll be able to "boost" your mindshare by pledging your yaps to a certain board/project, and therefore amplify your bullposting. When this happens, @TheoriqAI will be my first choice most likely because, even though I'm a bit late to it due to work, I've realized there's a lot of things to cover, as is the case with most projects, and I think it will pay dividends given that they're including the top 250 on their own lb. There's others that I'm planning too, ofc, but this is the one I'm most bullish on right now and the ones that I think will do good by their communities. --------------------- Closing thoughts: Your biggest edge is tuning in when others are tuning out. Summer is perfect for this. Doing the research, converting thoughts/screenshots into actionable content. That's how you play the SocialFi thing. You can do it even with a full time job in parallel (I am), you just have to optimize for it and want it bad enough. This challenge is not sponsored by anyone but me (no complaints if anyone wants to, my DMs are open), and its proof that you can get by and make a first world salary no matter where you are on the planet. So far, so good - let's keep it up.

PayFi on @solana brought to you by @humafinance nuff said

Came to Hangzhou and had a big fish head from Qiandao Lake with @daidaibtc and Anthony @1kbxx. Last week, I lost nearly 30,000 RMB trading altcoins (which is about 200 or so). I mainly bought ETH, AAVE, UNI, virtuals, and HUMA. I feel like I used to be quite skilled at playing on-chain, but recently I've noticed that there are indeed fewer on-chain casinos. I started slowly getting into contracts. In fact, I've also noticed that more and more people are starting to play contracts because the opportunities for small bets on-chain are becoming fewer. So everyone is turning to a constant casino with high-leverage contracts. I have achieved results on-chain, but I really can't understand contracts. After talking with two super strong traders today, I decided to never touch contracts again. First of all, I feel that the randomness of contracts is really strong, and it's very difficult to judge long or short. Of course, there are many talented players like @thankUcrypto @Jingxin147741 @CryptoApprenti1 @liangxihuigui who are amazing traders. But recognizing the limits of my abilities is really important. I find that I can't be sensitive to numbers, and I can't even discipline myself to set stop losses and reopen positions. In several small rebounds, I had the opportunity to stop loss and escape, but I continued to hold due to greed, which led to being completely trapped. Because the strategy of heavily investing at the bottom of meme coins and holding until they are listed no longer exists in the secondary contract market, it causes on-chain players to migrate to the contract field with a very obvious dullness. Moreover, since most meme coins are based on faith and the rhythm of the market, the constant rotation of altcoins actually doesn't have that many references. @0xpeas also saw Dou Shen go from losing 30,000 to 4,000, and then rebound from 4,000 to 60,000. This kind of execution power, she also mentioned that traders must overcome themselves. In fact, everyone envies those who can endure, including me, but there is only one who can endure; their courage, luck, focus, and patience are unmatched by ordinary people. However, I will continue to learn and pay tuition to the market. I feel that as long as I maintain confidence in this market, review more, be brave to communicate with strong players, not give up easily, not feel too much pressure, dare to persist, focus, be optimistic + proactive, and keep a positive mindset, I can achieve my own great results. Recently, my team @soon_svm and I are developing our copy trading platform together. I feel that since I can't trade well, a copy trading platform will be a good choice. I will take time to explain our copy trading platform in detail later. Anyway, losing money is not scary; as long as I maintain a positive attitude and believe in the conservation of energy, I will definitely earn it back! 🤪

7 best #Altcoins to hold for long term $AI : 0.12$ $MAGIC : 0.15$ $RARE : 0.05$ $HMSTR : 0.00081$ $AGLD : 0.75$ $HUMA : 0.039$ $RED : 0.28$ $BTC will close this year with 150K$ price (Max dip 80-95K$)

Recent thoughts on RWA and real income: TLDR: The crypto space needs real income, but the trust cost is very low. Currently, RWA projects rely on token compensation to gain sufficient attraction, comparable to native crypto yields (lending/fees); however, the transparency is far inferior to native crypto projects. Therefore, any projects that show even a slight improvement on this basis are good projects. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ The intention behind writing this is that a friend from a web2 listed company recently asked me about RWA, saying they want to invest in a solar power station overseas, but due to the complexity of ODI, there is no foreign financing entity; they thought RWA might solve this problem (permissionless USD bonds?). So, I was discussing recent projects I’ve seen while contemplating this industry. Recently, I saw two projects on my timeline: @gaib_ai's fundraising to buy graphics cards and @Conflux_Network x @dForcenet's two rounds of battery swapping, which are essentially no different from the solar power station my friend proposed. Both aim to raise funds, with returns on-chain to investors, and the expected yield (excluding token subsidies) is around 8%. Moreover, the RWA projects available to retail investors now have a similar structure—real demand terminals find project parties to issue bonds, and the project parties act as GPs to underwrite to retail investors. Previously, more compliant RWAs were not accessible to retail investors, who could only circulate within whitelists. From the terminal's perspective: web2 financing is heavily regulated, and people are smart with their money. Financing is easier to come by in web3. From the project party's perspective: I ensure compliance and earn the money I should as a GP. As long as I can issue tokens to incentivize retail investors to buy my products, that’s enough. From the retail investor's perspective: I trust these projects backed by big names; they sound reliable, and I’m essentially mining points. It’s fundamentally about sacrificing liquidity to earn money from the secondary market/MM. Previously, there was a fairly thorough discussion under a tweet from CFX, and today GAIB also came to the Pendle community for an AMA. To be honest, for "veterans," the attraction seems insufficient. There are already very few buyers in the secondary market of crypto; truly innovative or long-term valuable projects are the only ones whose tokens will be worth something. To compare with two projects I participated in: 1. Ethena, a representative of native crypto yields, even though it has now scaled to 6B, it still offers an average annual yield of over 8%. The transparency is good enough, with monthly CEFFU audit reports, and you can see the money in the custody wallet on-chain, making it operational. The duration is short, with a 7-day redemption period. 2. Huma, with a 10.5% native yield. The transparency is not as good as pure native projects, but due to Payfi's characteristics, it will utilize blockchain, so each loan is still traceable, which is better than purely offline products (what if the graphics card gets stolen or the solar power station gets blown up?). The duration is technically around a month, but the current redemption time can be made very short, and the exposure of each fund is also sufficiently short. There won’t be issues like not breaking even after three years of operation, being unable to redeem, or facing a bank run. So, in my view, what RWA project parties need to do now is to find better PMF. Is there money that can only be earned in the crypto space? (Payfi?) They need to achieve higher yields or improve transparency compared to purely offline projects. If it’s purely token subsidies, thinking that crypto money is easier to attract than web2 money ultimately consumes their long-term credibility. The "dumb money" in crypto will eventually be drained one day. In fact, the current "RWA" circle in Shenzhen is already very close to the trading circle and the previous P2P circle; sometimes, the slide happens in an instant.