Conflux Token price

I gave you $SEI around 0.14$ and it hit 1.14$ Solid 1000% gain in 1 year and now next leg up started to 1$ ✅

We are now ranking these 23 coins on whether or not they can perform a 1,000x. $PTGC #SPX6900 $TEDDY $KEKEC $GAS $URMOM #OMALLEY $CFX $HYPER #FCK925 $UFO $KOMUGI $PEPE $NEIRO $TRUMP $WIF $BRETT $MANYU $PSY $WET $DOGE $NAKA $WETT

Recent thoughts on RWA and real income: TLDR: The crypto space needs real income, but the trust cost is very low. Currently, RWA projects rely on token compensation to gain sufficient attraction, comparable to native crypto yields (lending/fees); however, the transparency is far inferior to native crypto projects. Therefore, any projects that show even a slight improvement on this basis are good projects. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ The intention behind writing this is that a friend from a web2 listed company recently asked me about RWA, saying they want to invest in a solar power station overseas, but due to the complexity of ODI, there is no foreign financing entity; they thought RWA might solve this problem (permissionless USD bonds?). So, I was discussing recent projects I’ve seen while contemplating this industry. Recently, I saw two projects on my timeline: @gaib_ai's fundraising to buy graphics cards and @Conflux_Network x @dForcenet's two rounds of battery swapping, which are essentially no different from the solar power station my friend proposed. Both aim to raise funds, with returns on-chain to investors, and the expected yield (excluding token subsidies) is around 8%. Moreover, the RWA projects available to retail investors now have a similar structure—real demand terminals find project parties to issue bonds, and the project parties act as GPs to underwrite to retail investors. Previously, more compliant RWAs were not accessible to retail investors, who could only circulate within whitelists. From the terminal's perspective: web2 financing is heavily regulated, and people are smart with their money. Financing is easier to come by in web3. From the project party's perspective: I ensure compliance and earn the money I should as a GP. As long as I can issue tokens to incentivize retail investors to buy my products, that’s enough. From the retail investor's perspective: I trust these projects backed by big names; they sound reliable, and I’m essentially mining points. It’s fundamentally about sacrificing liquidity to earn money from the secondary market/MM. Previously, there was a fairly thorough discussion under a tweet from CFX, and today GAIB also came to the Pendle community for an AMA. To be honest, for "veterans," the attraction seems insufficient. There are already very few buyers in the secondary market of crypto; truly innovative or long-term valuable projects are the only ones whose tokens will be worth something. To compare with two projects I participated in: 1. Ethena, a representative of native crypto yields, even though it has now scaled to 6B, it still offers an average annual yield of over 8%. The transparency is good enough, with monthly CEFFU audit reports, and you can see the money in the custody wallet on-chain, making it operational. The duration is short, with a 7-day redemption period. 2. Huma, with a 10.5% native yield. The transparency is not as good as pure native projects, but due to Payfi's characteristics, it will utilize blockchain, so each loan is still traceable, which is better than purely offline products (what if the graphics card gets stolen or the solar power station gets blown up?). The duration is technically around a month, but the current redemption time can be made very short, and the exposure of each fund is also sufficiently short. There won’t be issues like not breaking even after three years of operation, being unable to redeem, or facing a bank run. So, in my view, what RWA project parties need to do now is to find better PMF. Is there money that can only be earned in the crypto space? (Payfi?) They need to achieve higher yields or improve transparency compared to purely offline projects. If it’s purely token subsidies, thinking that crypto money is easier to attract than web2 money ultimately consumes their long-term credibility. The "dumb money" in crypto will eventually be drained one day. In fact, the current "RWA" circle in Shenzhen is already very close to the trading circle and the previous P2P circle; sometimes, the slide happens in an instant.

$0.00068 —-> $0.028 Solid 40X gain on $PEPE in just 1 year ✅

I have to admit that this alkane protocol Alkanes, filled with ground promotion and a Chinese-style plate vibe, really seems to come from foreigners. Last year, I criticized ordinal, criticized unisat, criticized the domestic Bitcoin plates, but this year I won't. After experiencing projects like avail, s&x, and lagrange, which were constantly hyped by foreign projects but whose market cap was less than that of a local dog coin, especially after the airdrop shares of the latter two were less than 0.5%, I feel that whether it's a domestic project or not has become less important. Since when did domestic projects start to gain a notorious reputation? In 2017, domestic projects like NEO, Qtum, VeChain, Aeternity brought hundreds of times profits, and even TRON and BNB can be considered domestic projects, right? In 2021, domestic projects like Conflux, Star Atlas, and dodo also brought huge returns. In 2022, the galxe and the running shoe StepN that I participated in were also domestic projects, and their reputations were quite good at that time. There are many more that I can't remember. However, in recent years, domestic projects have not been doing well, and the consensus formed by airdrop promoters is that domestic projects and Indian projects are not worth playing with. At first glance, the alkane protocol Alkanes feels like a domestic project, but when I tried to find a definitive basis as I did before, I actually failed; I couldn't find it! If a domestic project can disguise itself to fool me, then it is quite impressive. Entering early and exiting quickly is all that matters. Just like the ordi in 23-24, I feel that this is all being played by domestic players, with hundreds of times returns for those who entered early, while those who entered late are still cursing. Compared to the leading coin $ORDI with a market cap of over a billion, and leading NFTs like Bit Frog and Node Monkey, it seems that the few leading tokens and NFT competitors of Alkanes still have huge room for development. So I bought some, but I don't recommend everyone to follow. I'm just trying to transition from an old-school stubborn airdrop player to a new-style compatible player. Because I found that the times when I made money the fastest were when I could accept new things. I previously resisted ordi, resisted local dog coins, and missed many opportunities. So this year, I tried the ton NFT gifts, tried to engage with local dog coins, and tried new meta protocols. I'm trying many new things because I don't want to miss the new breakout points that are about to emerge in 2025, even though I don't know what they are. But it definitely isn't Alkanes, haha.