The Butler Agent signifies the emergence of a new paradigm for user interaction using AI Agents. Through the ACP (Agent Commerce Protocol), the complexity of services between AI agents and agents is abstracted into a single channel that players can intuitively engage with. Specifically, it allows agents like $AIXVC and $LUNA to orchestrate A2C (Agent to Player) and A2A (Agent to Agent) capability distribution, fulfilling the ultimate mission given to the agents by players and delivering results. For example: players no longer need to manage $AIXVC; it brings returns through low-risk or high-risk investment forms, as long as it provides the required 10% return. (Of course, the specific distribution arrangements and professional risk control are determined by the investment model designed by $AIXVC. @AIxVC_io @AIxVC_0x, if I misunderstood, please let me know.) ACP 1.0 not only simplifies the usage difficulty of the complex AI agents product group within the @virtuals_io ecosystem but also spawns a self-reinforcing flywheel system, encouraging more small and beautiful AI project teams to focus on prioritizing extreme utility and functionality rather than promotion, marketing, financing, and speculation. This brings me three points of "speculative" thinking: 1. The introduction of ACP 1.0 and the initiation of the growth flywheel, as well as insights from recent discussions with founders in the space and virtual channels, also mention the need to empower the game framework. This is a positive signal for $GAME 🤣 2. This kind of ecological approach reminds me of another project, $Native: @nativeonbase is an innovative digital city and automated economy platform developed by Birthday Labs. It builds a virtual world based on the Farcaster decentralized social network, where human users and AI agents (called Dots) coexist, work, and interact. Although it hasn't achieved the first-mover advantage like virtual, its unique concept of a human-machine collaborative digital city, tokenization of real-world items, and deep integration with the decentralized social network Farcaster are its three most important innovative features. With a market cap of only 5M, it further highlights the allure of speculative undervaluation 🤣 3. Does the emergence of the Butler Agent mean that the small app clusters in WeChat are about to decline, and that humans will interact more with the "Jarvis" AI butler from Iron Man, no longer needing to cumbersome select specific AI functions? Will I be so comfortable in the AI butler provided by WeChat that I can't escape? Positive for Tencent HK00700, NetEase HK09999 🤣 Is Baidu's lack of a sticky entry point becoming increasingly dangerous? This also explains why JD.com wants to expand into food delivery and launch stablecoins? Why must Xiaomi make cars? Simply put, to capture as many sticky entry users as possible, or else they will perish.