Just wanna point out how ridiculous Alexander's take is. Mostly because it's completely wrong. But also because he's considered a leader. Despite doing literally nothing to verify any of his claims: 1. 'pepe/mog/milady cabal launch IMF' False. No 'cabal' here. Just memecoin bulls. So much so, we've pioneered MemeFi, to disrupt the traditional model. In fact, the project began at an ETH Global hackathon in Sydney. The only connection to Mog is that I aped in Nov 2023. 2. 'IMF business model is asking organic grassroots for free tokens' False. In fact, the opposite. We've given away over $8M in $IMF rewards to our users from each of our listed memecoins. The business model is taking a 6.9% cut of interest generated. Feel free to use data to verify and inform your opinions: earn .imf .bz + data .imf .bz 3. 'IMF facilitates lending against those tokens, thus introducing a short market and a conflict of interest' False. We don't lend collateral. We literally can't. This is collateralized lending. Not money markets. Long only technology. We deliver new buying power to those that are listed. $42M delivered so far. 4. 'no one is allowed to vote on listings except for IMF insiders (holders prior to a certain date) False. Anyone can vote, as long as they hold $IMF and deposit it into the protocol. One token = one vote. We don't even use snapshot-based voting. We developed continuous narrow governance specifically for this purpose. 5. 'Cabal then goes on X and shamelessly begs organic token holders for bribes for something we don’t want and never asked for' False. Your priors have been begging for an IMF listing since our V1. Now we're live with a V2 that has product market fit and you'd rather deprive your community of new buying power. Alexander's grades: - 0/5 correct - 5/5 wrong Lmao.