⌠ Why did I choose to chase high on the car $GG ⌡ ​ I slept late on the weekend today, and when I got up, I saw someone in the group shouting $GG on the @BNBCHAIN, and immediately jumped up to do research, and after the study, I thought there was no problem and went straight to the car, and I was covered a little, and the current market value is 900k. I think it's quite interesting, so let's talk about my buying logic, I can state that there is no advertisement, purely my own position, this is an advertisement, I was hit by a car and died. ​ This token is very clear that it is $TUT's @adam2key is right, you can see the corresponding token from the end of his film, they TUT Group including Founder also jointly tracked the number @GameGuideBNB of the CA, and then from the perspective of chip analysis, it is no problem, people who have traced $TUT chips will definitely see a whole row of familiar addresses, and if this can still run, I can only say that the conscience is really gnawed by the dog. 𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂 ​ ▌ Buy logic ​ 1. The project team has a very high degree of control I have my own chip analysis system, at least about 91% of the chips currently controlled by the official, although the official should not be able to drill all to the end, but at least the control is very stable, if this piece is temporarily locked, the conversion of market value is actually only about 100k... There's nothing to think about about this, is it? At present, the symbol of official shipments is that there are more sporadic insider friends who have a little bit of positions, and Dev has added a unilateral pool, but this token is a V2 model, so this unilateral flat distribution is honestly not worth any goods at all, you can rest assured. ​ 2. @tutorialtoken Founder in the car I won't point this out directly, it shouldn't be difficult to climb, anyway, he also bought thousands of knives and put them away, from this point of view, it can be regarded as support, not to mention that he also bought it and didn't ship it all the time. ​ 3. The TUT team and external interest groups all interact It can be seen that this is @adam2key that is, the project sent by the trusted members of the TUT team, and the @Kaizenjj12 @YerasylAmanbek at the bottom of the post have all responded, including the official accounts, all of which have also helped to retweet and write small articles, and they have directly helped endorse it. 🔗： ​ 4. Valuation miskilling I see some people talking about this game is bad or something, but from the Founder article and the website, it can be seen that this game is purely a demonstration, he is more like helping @IdosGames issue a coin of the entire platform ecology, and claims that there will be a function to incentivize platform participants in the future, and also arrange the corresponding token economy, and the Stake function will be launched in the future. (There is also the possibility of official retweet support from CZ and BNBChain) 𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂 ​ ▌ Risks ​ 1. Only about 45% of the official token economy is reserved, so the remaining control positions will definitely come out one day, and it is not impossible for them to wait and start selling, this can only be gambled. ​ 2. At present, the overall look of whether it is the website, planning, or publicity, I don't know if they are trying or what, and they are not pushing crazy like $Z and $TUT. ​ 3. It's not a token launched by Fourmeme, which is a bit of a loss, mainly because the focus of this month is all on Fourmeme events, and the liquidity is indeed very, very poor over the weekend, so it may really not get up. ​ 4. In the past, they Dev has also developed a token $SURF, and the highest is only 1.5m, which shows that the standard of liquidity is not very valid here, which is the point that makes me hesitate the most, so be sure to think clearly. 5. It's true that I'm not as strong as the bottom of the second stage, so maybe I'm just a fool. 𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂 ​ ▌ How much to see ​ I've seen the 25% theory mentioned by Wei Shen before, and I have always felt that it is very useful, so if you take the 28m market value of $TUT in exchange, this $GG is worth at least 7m, and then count some deductions that are not in half, there is also 3.5m, which is 3 times the space, so my current psychological expectation is 3m in the first stage. ​ As for why I said the break-even ratio is good? Because retail investors don't have much chips to smash, as I said above, if the official himself doesn't smash the market and sell it secretly, at most 9% of retail chips really can't go down, the lower limit is very limited but the upper limit is worth imagining, and the current price is a good intervention price, so I bet. ​ Of course, the above risks are also mentioned, that is, this token really did not rise up and poured all the way, that is, there is really no way, to be honest, I shouted that this psychological pressure is also great, I am very afraid of the official messing around or the weekend liquidity is too poor, so DYOR is at its own risk, and if you want to be safe, you can buy it between 500k~700k. Don't kidnap morally, I will definitely ship at a high price, and my position is free to buy and sell. ​ 𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂𒅂 ​ #CharmingPost @ethos_network $KAITO #Opnup #Openledger @GiveRep #Kaito @thep33l @cookiedotfun #SNAPS @sparkdotfi @fantasy_top_ #TheP33L @KaitoAI @virtuals_io #VirgenPoints @BasisOS $BIOS @MirraTerminal @ATTNtoken #RiverPtsAirdrop #River @aimi_xyz @stayloudio #Loudio @River4fun @yapyo_arb @RiverdotInc

@johnhu432 @BNBCHAIN It's pretty much the same meaning; the ceiling for the sub-token will be around 25% of the market cap of the main token. If it keeps breaking through this ceiling, it could threaten the main token's position. Trump and Trump Wife Coin also followed this unwritten theory back then haha. It's a relatively simple and easy way to estimate valuation, and I find it quite useful.