Visually, Ethos is about to be completely out of the circle! There are users who are @cz_binance SlashCZ ! The stake is 212 points, and if successful, CZ's reputation score will be directly reduced to the average user! Slash is similar to a public trial assembly, when someone is very disliked by another person, a citizen trial can be initiated in this way, and all Ethos users vote to decide whether the party being tried is "guilty"? In that case, the moot court is open! The following is purely a whole job, the purpose is to show how to play @ethos_network, please don't take it seriously! In particular, please don't really bring the big cousin CZ into the court scene, this is just a way to play the Web3 reputation system, just use it as entertainment! Let's get started! Plaintiff: @chadstrdaumus0 Current credit score: 1703 Defense: @cz_binance Current credit rating: 1569 Plaintiff's Submissions (Translation): ======================== "Liars, shady, no longer trustworthy" It's becoming more and more obvious that CZ is turning into a problem figure in the crypto space! First of all, the situation of the @dingalingts and the recent "Boop FUD" is unacceptable: @dingalingts maintains close ties with Binance in a variety of capacities, which is well documented and easily searchable; CZ himself has admitted this in past interviews. Now that he is openly distancing himself and throwing @dingalingts under the bus, we will not tolerate such a thing. @dingalingts is one of the most respected figures in the crypto world and one of our heroes, and it is unforgivable to spread misinformation or lies about him. Not to mention broccoli...... ======================== Defendant's conduct: In a reply, CZ disclosed Binance's internal management structure, and highlighted that "the former employee who was fired because of the rat barn, and a few years later said what is the founder, CXO..." This was regarded by a large number of people as an allusion to @dingalingts's personal profile, and it quickly spread widely, gaining nearly 300,000 views, and gradually fermenting in the English-speaking community. Since CZ stated that the story is fictional, please do not sit in the opposite number, so the logic of this insinuation is relatively vague at present; ========================= Then there is the opinion of the ad hoc judge @0x5f_eth: "I think this lawsuit lacks a lot of context, and it would have been nice if more details could have been provided." Since @0x5f_eth is the founder of Ethos and the most reputable person in the entire community, he has a very objective judgment on the entire reputation mechanism, so his opinion is currently the most neutral, and he can assume the role of temporary judge; ========================= Finally, the jury's opinion (translation): @LeoxCrane： He described the reply as pure fiction to avoid legal trouble, and maybe the co-founder did insider trading, but no one knew the specifics; I just think Slash is right, and in order to continue to grow, Binance started listing a lot of junk tokens last year; And they let the token go down just to attack Hyperliquid, and then now it's grown to talk about Ding, so for me, looking at the timeline of events, Slash is pretty good! ” @bread_treats： "I don't like CZ, but this time I voted for him. I don't see any motive for him to lie, and if Dingaling lies, it's obviously beneficial. Also, the whole statement that Dingaling is a "hero" is a bit weird... Whose hero? This dude has made a few Ponzi scheme websites, what's the big deal? If we're going to hold CZ accountable, please provide some truthful information and not make up fanfiction for a shitcoin developer. ” @RestlessHavoc： "It's just venting, and it's not to blame, because most of the things here are just speculation." @thisissmooth： "As far as I understand at the moment, these are just a bunch of over-interpreted information without any clear evidence! Is this really worth being Slashed? We were talking about something that someone had said in an interview, and then they repeated it vaguely in a tweet without naming names. It's easy to over-interpret, and they're probably referring to a few different people! Here are the facts: CZ's remarks: Contradicting the statement here: The premise is that we assume that in both cases, he is talking about Dingaling. If you want me to say, this is complete nonsense. I don't think there is enough evidence to support a trial at the moment! ” ========================= Current Case Status: A total of 16 people participated in the judging, with 12 currently voting for Slash and 4 voting for CZ! Nearly 80% support Slash! However, the duration of this citizens' meeting is still more than 40 hours, so during this period, the wind of public opinion will continue to change, maybe CZ only needs to remain silent, and Binance's supporters will launch a counterattack; Or @dingalingts supporters who fight more and more and finally succeed in cutting CZ's credibility score... In any case, this is the most likely day to receive a lot of attention since the release of Ethos, after all, everything that happens here is also going on the chain, whether it is a simple comment or a simple like, it is possible to stay on the chain forever. This also brings a message to the founders, project parties and KOLs of the entire cryptocurrency community from the side, don't be evil! The eyes of the masses are bright! Finally, I hope CZ will be judged fairly, and I very much don't want to see emotional, angry voting, or a large number of trolls! I only hope that everyone will express their opinions truthfully and objectively, not to be carried away by anger, not to be bent by the powerful, not to mention simple personal attacks, please be a reasonable bystander! Thank you!