Comparison chart 🆚 of DePIN project data Regarding the user needs of DePIN, I think web2 and web3 have different logics 🛜Web2 users are preferred Service Reliability / Lower Cost / Positive ROI ⚛️Web3-native users need a fast feedback loop – deploying > action > earning Here's a breakdown of the differences between Dabba: 1️⃣ Low-volatility, operation-free revenue model Dabba is rewarded through escrow deployments and daily DBT tokens Provide simple, low-risk passive income with a low technical barrier to entry, suitable for bear market and mainstream users. Compared to the technical complexity of Helium and the slow efficiency of World Mobile, the advantages are still relatively obvious. 2️⃣ Efficient data processing and high-demand deployment It processes 60TB of data per day, which is higher than that of Helium and Dawn, and the hotspots are only deployed in high-demand areas in India, integrating the 150,000+ LCO network, similar to Uber to aggregate the fragmented market and maximize resource utilization and revenue. 3️⃣ Infrastructure reuse and ecological cooperation Supporting DePIN projects such as WeatherXM, hotspots can be deployed once and used multiple times, reducing costs, and cooperating with $BONK (committed to selling 10,000 hotspots) to enhance the trust of the market. 4️⃣ Plug & Play & Quick Profit Removing technical barriers, LCO hosting ensures that you can start making money in a matter of days, which is better than Helium's 2-6 week deployment time, and the carrier-first revenue model is more efficient than traditional ISPs. These are some of the highlights of Dabba, and in general, the development of DePIN is still in its early stages, and it will take a long time to practice and run-in, but you can continue to pay attention.